It would have cost NASA more to fake the first moon landing than it would have to just land on the moon

FB Top Comments
There was a waving flag in no air atmosphere. .. logic?
We landed on the fucking moon wtf is wrong with ppl grow up and jump off the conspiracy band wagon. Seriously there were no stars in the sky in the pictures taken, there were footprints but no blast crater from the rocket ship, shadows pointing in different directions indicating many sources of light, etc.
what can people believe these days...
Elvis is alive etc,.
If there isn't any light pollution in the moon why can't you see any stars?
Ok, so if we faked the land way back when we first landed on the moon. We have definitely landed on it by now, I mean come on does it really matter if they 'faked' the landing? Its the moon there is literally no use for it besides regulating the currents of all large bodies of water. The sad part about this....it would have taken me about 15 seconds to say all of this^
I find it more amusing that people even care to discuss the topic - what kind of impact has the truth ( whatever it may be ) on today's world? Back in the day it was an important event that affected the entirety of mankind; now it's just a page in our history and science books. Back in the day it marked a victory during the Cold War - today...again, just pages in books.
Whether fake or not is irrelevant since life is about looking and going forward and not bitching about the conspiracies of the past.